Tuesday, July 28, 2015

Parent Alienation Fault of Berks County Children and Youth Services

Ongoing issues with this agency:

William Brown a devoted father learned very quickly how the interference of BCCYS can destroy a once happy and successful life.  While going through custody issues in Montgomery County his daughters mother decided to move to Berks County.  As with many investigations into BCCYS cases the mother decided using the agency as a tool would help her in alienated William.  Montgomery County already had concerns about Parental Alienation and had court ordered expert Dr. Brynne Rivlin to evaluate the parents and child.  Brynne Rivlin is author of a highly recognized book "Children Held Hostage: Identifying Brainwashed Children, Presenting a Case and Crafting Solutions."  As a skilled professional in alienation by parents she found that indeed there were issues in the Brown case and was working to resolve those issues by keeping both parents involved in their 13 year old daughter's life.  Mother refused to meet with Dr. Rivlin and set out to destroy the loving caring relationship her daughter had with her father.
My daughter enjoyed a very active life when with me by attending dance classes which she loved and excelled at.  She had hopes of getting adult dance parts since turning thirteen and also enjoyed assisting a dance instructor with 4-5 year olds.  She had very dear friends and enjoyed doing various activities with them.  She received high scores at school and was a very well rounded child.  She loved her daddy but seemed to be getting more and more frustrated with having to communicate between parents.
In February 2008 all the happiness and joy William had of being a father was completely destroyed when the mother made a false report to Childline accusing him of child abuse.  William received a call from BCCYS supervisor Judy Hoover-Thompson that he would no longer be permitted visits with his daughter due to the abuse allegations.  He was informed that his daughter was now in the custody of BCCYS and her mother.  At the hearing even though William presented evidence through Montgomery County court records and the evaluation by Dr Rivlin the court ruled no contact with his daughter.
I felt like my daughter had been kidjacked.  BCCYS refused to address any of the information presented to them including testimony from teachers and those who know my daughter and I.  Her mother pulled her out of the dance classes she loved so much and I was literally cut out of my child's life having done nothing to deserve the treatment dealt me.  It was the clearest misuse of power I had ever witnessed.  Then as if I wasn't suffering enough emotional pain and stress I was terminated from my job due to the false Childline report made against me.  I was a counselor working with children in the system and knew full well how mentally disturbed and angry they would get when taken from parents and people they loved.  I was so concerned for what my daughter was experiencing due to this inflicted pain by BCCYS. I worked in a clinical profession for 27 years and it still stuns me how I trusted and was fooled by the system to do the right thing for me and my daughter.
While he continued to struggle with finding ways to get reunited with his daughter social worker Nicole Robinson at BCCYS was arranging a court ordered evaluation with Dr. Richard Small of Spring Psychological and Allison Hill PHD of Berks Psychological.  The evaluation was conducted by Hill but only done with mother and daughter.  William was not asked to participate.  This evaluation was used to back up BCCYS in further alienating him and his daughter.  William never even received a copy of the report until a custody conference which left no time for he or his attorney to examine the report. 
Throughout all court hearings Nicole Robison and solicitor for BCCYS, Jennifer Grimes continued to make false allegations and united with the mother in creating the child abuse accusation.  They joined ranks with the mother in using the child as a vessel and brain washed my daughter into making false statements to support their corrupt actions.  They ignored my civil and amendment rights.  I received no due process and they purposely never investigated all the proof accessible to them in my favor.
 Parental alienation (or Hostile Aggressive Parenting) is a group of behaviors that are damaging to children's mental and emotional well-being, and can interfere with a relationship of a child and either parent. These behaviors most often accompany high conflict marriages, separation or divorce. These behaviors whether verbal or non-verbal, cause a child to be mentally manipulated or bullied into believing a loving parent is the cause of all their problems, and/or the enemy, to be feared, hated, disrespected and/or avoided. 
In March of 2008 full custody was granted to the mother.  Williams daughter is now 21 years old and has been denied years of valuable time with her father.  He has been emotionally tortured and judicially abused.  Once again BCCYS has dismantled a family.  Again the same names of those directly involved in many cases are destroying what were healthy loving relationships.  William did not stop seeking justice for his name and character.  On January 13, 2011 he received an Order of Remand issued by the PA Department of Public Welfare Hearings and Appeals that the evaluation by Dr Hill was tainted due to false information submitted by Nicole Robinson.  That the courts failed to adequately consider testimony from 2 witnesses for William and a new adjudication was issued.  BCCYS never followed up on reopening his case. 
I have come forth with this information in hopes further exposing this abuse and corruption.  I have faced yet another painful Father's Day without my daughter.  Every Christmas, birthday, or significant event in my life I am unable to share with the most precious gift, my daughter.  She was ripped from my life under the direction of social worker, Nicole Robinson who was backed by BCCYS staff, affiliated doctors, judges, lawyers, guardian ad litems and Berks County Family Courts.  I have participated in counseling to try and understand and deal with what I must face day after day without my daughter in my life. I haven't even been able to reach out to her because I do not know where she is.  I remain at the same address where her bedroom has gone untouched.  All her clothing, pictures, and memories of the happiness this house once held when she was here calling me daddy wait for her return.  As agonizing as it has been to relive the horror of the hearings, job loss, accusations against me and loss I am determined to make a difference in reforming and changing the way the family courts and Human Services operate.  Parent Alienation is a serious transgression and is being carried out by the very people employed by our government and the tax dollars they receive to protect families and children.

Saturday, June 27, 2015

Tony and Danille BCCYS Kidjacked Their Daughter


Dismantling Our Families For Profit
There has been an outcry all over the nation regarding the corruption in our court system.  Many are experiencing misguided justice in Pennsylvania including here in Berks County.  On May 4, 2015 Cynthia Cruz, a Berks County social worker plead guilty to fraud for stealing $97,000 over a four year period by way of Medicaid Claims.  In February of 2008 the "Kids for Cash" scandal began to explode as two judges, Mark Ciaverella and Michael Conahan from Luzerne County, were caught taking $2.6 million in kickbacks from Robert Mericle, a juvenile facility builder, in return for sending children to his for-profit facilities.  These cases are just a peak into the window of the potential for fraud and misuse of money provided to states and counties in Public Welfare, family courts and Children and Youth Services.  Each state has cash incentives for this process through government funding.  Your tax dollars.   There is no set dollar amount.  If any of the 67 counties do not have enough funds they can access more funds at any time and have the necessary reimbursements made to the state.  Information on Title IV-E and other funding in the United States as well as the chart below can be reviewed through research done by Child Welfare: An Overview of Federal Programs and Their Current Funding:
Title 1V-E Program
FY20 12
FY2013
FY2014
FY20 15
Foster Care
$4,288,000,000
$4,285,540000
$4,279,000,000
$4,289,000,000
Adoption Assistance
$2,495,000,000
$2,368,6805,000
$2,463,000,000
$2,504,000,000
Kinship Guardianship Assistance
$80,000,000
$123,000,000
$124,000,000
$99,000,000

There are also incentives for adoption which are outlined on the American Adoptions site quoting dollar amounts as high as $13,190 per child in tax credits.  There is an open checkbook which is leading to the destruction of Americas core, the family.
These funds are used when Berks County Children and Youth Services (BCCYS)remove a child from their home and file a dependency petition to hold that child in their custody.  Parents Tony and Danielle are experiencing the various ways that monies provided for the protection of children can be distorted.  Instead of helping families this money is dismantling them in a tangled mismanaged system. 
In a minute your life can drastically change.  That is exactly what happened to Tony, Danielle and their daughter, Breanna.  In December of 2013 they were involved in a serious car accident close to their Exeter home.  Danielle suffered a broken neck and was taken to University of PA in Philadelphia.  Tony experienced head trauma with a broken sternum and ribs.  Their daughter, Breanna, who was nine years old had only minor seat belt burns.  A downhill spiral left them with no transportation, the loss of their home, most of their belongings, financial issues and coping with recovery from their injuries.  They temporarily rented a motel room in Douglassville and started searching for a home in the city.  An accident can be tragic for any family but it became a living nightmare in March of 2014 when two Amity police officers appeared at their motel room.  The parents were taken into custody for what the officer told them was for an outstanding parking ticket and a truancy fine.   Tony found it suspicious that Officer Ken Moyer had not only showed up at their motel room for a traffic ticket but had called Nicole Robinson from BCCYS to come to the motel room as well.  It was at this time BCCYS took custody of Breanna without a warrant or a court order.  The caseworker did not let Tony or Danielle  call any family or friends to come and get Breanna.  Danielle, still suffering with a broken neck was shackled and her and Tony were held in jail cells. They were released after 3 hours when there was proof Tony was making payments on the parking fine and the truancy fine had been paid.  When they returned home reality hit.  Their daughter was gone. 
The reason for the removal of their child was not abuse, was not abandonment, was not drugs or criminal activity.  BCCYS documents state the child was removed from her family because she was without proper care or control.  Breanna was completely healthy and unharmed and in no "imminent danger."   Recent school absences were due to the injuries her parents suffered in the accident and the location of where they were residing in Douglassville.  Their car was totaled in the accident and there were no funds to purchase another one.  They were not living in Breanna's school district and there was no bus service or means of transportation for them to use at the time.    
Determined to get their lives back on track and reclaim their daughter they moved into a home in the city so they had access to cabs and busses.  At this point BCCYS had already set up a safety plan listing things they had to do in order to reunite with their child.  These demands included evaluations, drug testing, parent coaching, therapists, and court dates.  Documents show Tony and Danielle have completed what was asked of them but the county has extended the procedures long enough to approach the 15 month time line when they can proceed to terminate the rights of the parents and adopt their child out to a foster family. 
The court date to terminate their parental rights is scheduled for July 7, 2015 at 9:30am.  Tony and Danielle have been through 8 months of forced urine tests at a cost of $20 each all of which were drug free and are still ongoing.  Other parents forced to give samples are given vouchers by the agency but when asked to provide the same to Tony said the agency refused.  They participate in parenting classes and therapy appointments which are all part of the safety plan requirements.  During Tony's testimony at one of the court hearings he said that Juvenile Court Master, Narcy Hughes, told him she didn't want to hear about the accident, which is the root of reason behind their case.
During my investigation I spoke to Amity Officer Ken Moyer about the night Breanna was taken from her parents.  He responded to my questions vaguely and said he did not remember the incident or any of the names involved.  Just 2 hours after my communication with Officer Moyer, caseworker Rachael Drobnick sent Tony an email stating that BCCYS had received a report of physical abuse and that both Tony and Danielle were cited as predators. 
Tony and Danielle swear no abuse of any kind was ever inflicted on their children.  BCCYS has no proof of those claims and the parents feel it is just a tactic to reach the 15 month goal of termination of parental rights.  The parents have reviewed documents that show those accusations involve the step son and his biological father, not Tony.  Tony did ask that the mistakes be corrected but the social worker responded that they were just typos and not to worry about them.  He states that BCCYS decided to up the ante and create false accusations or not clarify the information they have which is promoting the adoption of their child over reunification. 
This can happen to any family once involved with Children and Youth Services.  BCCYS may keep adding accusations and changing the direction of a case which can begin to wear parents down.  Tony says the process takes its toll emotionally, mentally and when possible, financially .  Often parents feel they have nobody to turn too.  They don't trust the lawyers, judges, social workers, therapists or anyone because even though they are doing everything they are asked to do to get their child back they learn they are being overpowered.  The Judge may refuse to listen to testimony from parents and appear to be deciding the case solely on the testimony and paperwork submitted by the social workers and all the court contracted lawyers, therapists and doctors to reach the final goal of dismantling the family.  Social workers are granted immunity allowing them the ability to be less than truthful and not be held accountable for misinformation.  Before parents actually grasp what is happening they learn their parental rights are being terminated and their child is being adopted out.  Few families have been able to stop this abuse of power by BCCYS.  There is no transparency.  Nobody is overseeing this corruption. 
I contacted President Judge Paul Yatron with my concerns and he informed me that he has no control over the actions of BCCYS.  He clarified that the commissioners run the agency and are in charge of complaints.  I left several messages for the commissioners not one of the three in office returned my calls.  I left a message with the district attorney's office and with Berks County detectives no calls were returned as of printing.
I did receive a call from interim Executive Director of BCCYS, Carl Geffken.  I explained my concerns in this case.  There was no court order or warrant when the child was taken.  The child was healthy and not in imminent danger.  There is proof that an acting court appointed attorney in this case took money from the parents.  There is also proof that US mail sent to Breanna was intercepted by the caseworker.  I gave details as to the caseworker entering the parents residence when they were not there and rummaged through their belongings giving their things away and destroying family heirlooms by throwing them in a dumpster.  I also told him of my conversation with Officer Moyer and that within two hours BCCYS informed the parents they received a complaint of abuse against them.  I made it clear that all of my concerns are criminal and the parents deserve justice.  At press time he had still not called me back with his findings. 
The other aspect of this is the child.  She was placed with strangers miles away from her school, friends and family.  All the letters and cards sent by her family and friends were seized by the county worker or the foster family leaving the child to feel abandoned and unloved.  The child was forced into counseling where Tony feels she has been groomed to believe her parents are bad people and have forgotten about her.  She is likely hearing this over and over from a counselor until she believes it.  The parents feel this is mental abuse inflicted by the county and the foster family in their joint efforts to make the child angry toward them and not want to return home.  They feel this group of contracted agencies force parent alienation to strengthen the path to adoption. 
Any child can be taken as long as the county has "findings" for removal and these are very vague as described in the Child Welfare Information Gateway and the PA Code to Child Protective Services .  Tony and Danielle's case began as truancy issues according to documents but the appointed and or contracted judges, lawyers, therapists, doctors and social workers involved in the case have prolonged reunification by keeping the child in placement.  This allows the county to continue to receive funding for her and all the contracted workers on her case to get paid and retain job security.  The more children in the "system" the more money.   
Tony and Danielle feel the courts have not only abused their civil rights but they have more than overstepped in intruding on their parental rights.  They have had two court appointed attorneys, Susan Scullin acting as guardian ad litem for Breanna, and Gregory Ghenn as their attorney.  Documents show Attorney Ghenn asked them for and accepted money from them while he was being paid by the county.  Ghenn returned the money when Tony questioned Ghenn's motives.   Tony states that BCCYS social worker, Rachel Drobnick, is often late to their appointments sometimes as long as 45 minutes.  He says she then has an appalling attitude towards them.  "She has never shown any compassion or interest in seeing to it that we would get our daughter back." At one visit to their home Tony claims she even gloated by calling them bad parents and making it clear they would never get their daughter back.  I spoke to the parent coach Shaundia Tabb and she told me that the paperwork she was given by BCCYS has errors that need to be fixed and she was going to talk to Rachel and have those corrections made.  We discussed how the abuse details did not involve Tony and Danielle but the step son and his bio dad. 
 Tony has paid Alan Zeigler, Esquire to take over their case.  After meeting with him he told them that the county was compiling unpleasant paperwork against them and he wanted an "outside" evaluation.  I spoke to Ziegler and he told me that social worker, Rachael, was also nasty with him when he reached out to her for information.  The lawyer also confirmed that all the letters and cards the parents had sent to Breanna were intercepted by the social worker and he actually saw them in the file and questioned why they were intercepted.  He asked if she had even read them to Breanna.  Rachael told him that she did not read them to the child because of references regarding BCCYS.  He has filed discovery to get copies of those letters and other evidence in the case.  Zeigler has fought battles with BCCYS before and is well aware of how far they will go in some cases.  He has gone outside of the contracted therapists to get the parents a fair evaluation.  The parents have already completed an evaluation with Dr. Small which I have reviewed and there is nothing in the report that would suggest these parents should not have their child.  A Concern therapist,  single handedly decided that Tony and Danielle would no longer be permitted visitation with their daughter because the visits she claims are detrimental to the child.  The money wheel keeps turning.  The clock is ticking. 
Meanwhile, Breanna remains in a foster home in Hereford Township and is being denied visits with her parents.  Tony and Danielle wonder about the county handling the delicate mental care and counseling  of their child.  They are concerned about the longtime scars she may suffer that could have a lifetime effect as she struggles to figure out why she can no longer see her parents and thinking they have stopped trying to get her home.  Tony and Danielle are fighting a stressful battle of their own without their daughter.  They were grief-stricken when they had to miss  Christmas with her.  They also never missed a birthday until this year when Breanna turned 11 years old.  Danielle is devastated that she was denied spending Mother's Day with her daughter and through her tears knows that Breanna was heartbroken as well.
While Tony and Danielle wait for the next hearing date they are facing an uphill fight to get their daughter home where she belongs.  Will Attorney Ziegler be the answer and end this nightmare by stopping BCCYS from giving their child away?  Will Gregory Ghenn be held accountable for taking money from desperate parents who want their child back while also being paid as an appointed attorney.  Will Narcy Hughes have to explain why she would not acknowledge testimony from the parents in her courtroom choosing instead to side with BCCYS when testimony may prove the child should be returned?  Will Nicole Robison and Rachel Drobnick be fired or convicted for their roles in removing the child unlawfully?  For intercepting US Mail?  For destruction of personal property?  For using misguided false accusations to retain her, and holding her hostage in the system?  Will the therapists and doctors involved lose their right to practice because they played a part in conspiring to force adoption of this child with no merit?  Will all the players be found guilty of racketeering which is defined as "a service that is offered to solve a problem that really does not exist?"  Simply put it is when an agency like BCCYS proclaims to solve the problems of neglected and abused children when in fact they are the bigger cause of the problem.  This information is sealed and often gag orders put in place to support their agenda and keep collecting money for the cause.  While their threats and claims of protection are supported by their government shield, Tony and Danielle consider it to be extortion. 
With more and more information being uncovered and shared by the media on the deception within the court system parents like Tony and Danielle are hoping for more transparency and oversight when it comes to children and families.   Nobody is immune or protected from this happening to them and quickly can be facing just how cruel and unforgiving the justice system can be.  They have since realized these agencies have no boundaries.  There are few attorneys who will risk retaliation from their peers by confronting the corruption in government funded child trafficking via children and youth agencies and our court system. 
Update a hearing on the Discovery was held June 22, 2015 and the case folder and cards/letters intercepted illegally by Racheal Drobnick were turned over to Atty Ziegler.  Zeigler refused to turn the folder and cards over to Tony and Danille.  Attorney Konrad Jazyna will be taking over the case.  Racheal Drobnick sent the parents an email that she is scheduling a hearing to have Breanna moved to yet another foster home instead of letting her come home to her parents.

Part II

Being in a car accident can be a traumatizing experience that most of us are able to recover from and move on.  For one Berks County couple that is far from what has happened.  Although they are recovering from their injuries they found themselves in a twisted government web that has caused more damage than the accident did.  Tony and Danielle have been fighting for 15 months to regain custody of their daughter after she was taken without a warrant or court order on March 14, 2014.  
Tony and Danielle feel the courts have not only abused their civil rights but they have more than overstepped in intruding on their parental rights.  They have had two court appointed attorneys, Susan Scullin acting as guardian ad litem for their daughter, and Gregory Ghenn as their attorney.  Documents show Attorney Ghenn asked them for and accepted money from them while he was being paid by the county.  Ghenn returned the money when Tony questioned Ghenn's motives.   Tony states that BCCYS social worker, Rachel Drobnick, is often late to their appointments sometimes as long as 45 minutes.  He says she then has an appalling attitude towards them.  "She has never shown any compassion or interest in seeing to it that we would get our daughter back." At one visit to their home Tony claims she even gloated by calling them bad parents and making it clear they would never get their daughter back. 
 Tony had paid Alan Zeigler, Esquire to take over their case.  After meeting with him he told them that the county was compiling unpleasant paperwork against them and he wanted an "outside" psychological evaluation.  I spoke to Ziegler and he told me that social worker, Rachael, was also nasty with him when he reached out to her for information.  The lawyer also confirmed that all the letters and cards the parents had sent to their daughter were intercepted by the social worker and he actually saw them in the file and questioned why they were intercepted.  He asked if she had even read them to the child.  Rachael told him that she did not read them to the child because of references regarding BCCYS.  He filed discovery to get copies of those letters and other evidence in the case.  That hearing was held June 22nd before Judge Ullman.  Attorney Zeigler was given the requested discovery items but has refused to turn them over to Tony and Danielle.  Zeigler has fought battles with BCCYS before and is well aware of how far they will go in some cases.  He prefers to go outside of the contracted therapists to get the parents a fair evaluation.  Tony and Danielle have already completed an evaluation with Dr. Small which I have reviewed and there is nothing in the report that would suggest these parents should not have their child.  A Concern therapist,  Gwen Albert may have single handedly decided that Tony and Danielle would no longer be permitted visitation with their daughter because the visits she claims are detrimental to the child.  The money wheel keeps turning.  The clock is ticking. 
Meanwhile, their daughter remains in a foster home in Hereford Township and is being denied visits with her parents.  Tony and Danielle wonder about the county's matter of handling the delicate mental care and counseling  of their child.  They are concerned about the longtime scars she may suffer that could have a lifetime effect as she struggles to figure out why she can no longer see her parents and thinking they have stopped trying to get her home.  Tony and Danielle are fighting a stressful battle of their own without their daughter.  They were grief-stricken when they had to miss  Christmas with her.  They also never missed a birthday until this year when Breanna turned 11 years old.  Danielle is devastated that she was denied spending Mother's Day with her daughter and through her tears knows that her daughter was heartbroken as well.  And just last month Tony faced father's day without his daughter by his side.
During the investigation into this case many questions have been raised about accountability.  I have read court documents proving that Attorney Greg Ghenn invoiced Tony and Danielle for $2500.00 while acting as their court appointed attorney and collecting from the county for his services.   On May 7th I spoke to Amity police officer, Ken Moyer, about the night he arrested Tony and Danielle for parking tickets and the phone call he made to social worker, Nicole Robinson, and had her come and take their child into BCCYS custody.  He claims he has no memory of the incident.  Yet he hand cuffed and shackled the parents in front of their daughter and started a nightmare for this family.  Just 3 hours later Judge Keller released Tony and Danielle because the parking tickets were either paid or payments were being made.  Due to the fact that there was no warrant or court order to pick the couple up in the first place the parents feel that the only motive was to take their daughter.
I spoke with Tony and Danielle's court ordered parent coach, Shaundia Tee, of Signature Family Services.   She also backed up Tony and Danielle's claim that there are many mistakes in the BCCYS paperwork they requested to be changed but social worker, Rachel Drobnick refused to make those changes.  As in many cases the social workers use these mistakes to further allegations against parents to keep children in custody.  All my calls to the three Berks County Commissioners went unreturned.  I even reached out to Commissioner Christian Leinbach on his facebook page with questions about illegal activity within BCCYS and he refused to talk to me about it and never used my phone number to reach out and discuss my concerns.  In over 70% of the cases I have worked on the parents involved complained to the commissioners about how they were treated by BCCYS staff and all complaints fell on deaf ears.  I did have a lengthy conversation with Don Vymazal.  He is running for the commissioner seat against Kevin Barnhardt.  It is hard to say how much he knows about the corruption within BCCYS.  I did give him a lengthy description of how families are being ripped apart for no reason.  I explained that the incentive for this keeps going back to the monies the county is receiving from the federal government for wrap around services provided to children in their custody.  I also gave examples of the cases where mail fraud, breaking and entering homes without warrants or court orders, forced sterilization and how newborns are taken from local hospitals by the agency before the mother is even released.   He claims to believe the county is not profiting from trafficking the children into foster care but said he would look into the finances and try and gather more information into how the agency is run.  I have not heard back from him.  At this point  if any change will happen we need new blood in the commissioners seats.  They control the agency and continue knowingly to allow the abuse of power to continue. 
 On May 8th I received a call from the interim executive director of BCCYS, Carl Geffken.  I explained to him my concerns and specific details on the illegal activity taking place within his agency.  He listened, made very few comments mostly to privacy issues and told me he would get back to me.  That call has not been returned.
On July 7th I attended a review hearing with the couple and their new attorney Konrad Jazyna.  Many family members also attended in support of Tony and Danielle and getting their daughter returned.  Tony's sister, who has applied for kinship was also in attendance.  When attorney Jazyna joined us he had the review paperwork which again was riddled with numerous errors.  Because the county is moving their daughter to another foster home her parents want to intercept the move and bring her home.  At this point Jazyna decided the best step was to request a hearing before Judge Ullman. 
So questions remain.  Will Gregory Ghenn be held accountable for taking money from desperate parents who want their child back while also being paid as an appointed attorney.  Will Narcy Hughes, the hearing master have to explain why she would not acknowledge testimony from the parents in her courtroom choosing instead to side with BCCYS when testimony may prove the child should be returned?  Will Nicole Robison and Rachel Drobnick be fired or convicted for their roles in removing the child unlawfully?  For intercepting US Mail?  For destruction of personal property?  For using misguided false accusations to retain the child, and holding her hostage in the system?  Will the therapists and doctors involved lose their right to practice because they played a part in conspiring to force adoption of this child with no merit?  Will all the players be found guilty of racketeering which is defined as "a service that is offered to solve a problem that really does not exist?"  Simply put it is when an agency like BCCYS proclaims to solve the problems of neglected and abused children when in fact they are the bigger cause of the problem.  This information is sealed and often gag orders put in place to support their agenda and keep collecting money for the cause.  While their threats and claims of protection are supported by their government shield, Tony and Danielle consider it to be extortion. 
With more and more information being uncovered and shared by the media on the deception within the court system parents like Tony and Danielle are hoping for more transparency and oversight when it comes to children and families.   Nobody is immune or protected from this happening to them and quickly can be facing just how cruel and unforgiving the justice system can be.  They have since realized these agencies have no boundaries.  There are few attorneys who will risk retaliation from their peers by confronting the corruption in government funded child trafficking via children and youth agencies and our court system.  We need to find ways to help families stay together instead of investing millions of dollars to keep them apart.
Part III
Not really sure what to make of an Attorney who is hired and paid to defend parents caught in the web of lies and corruption at CYS who bails out??  Was he threatened with retaliation?  Was he never going to help them from day one?  More often than not the CYS agency will threaten disbarrment if an attorney does not back off.  Now said atty wants to return money to client and run the other way?  Hearing has been canceled.  Drobnick has sent out papers for parents to sign if they want contact with their daughter when she is adopted.  That's like signing a paper saying your ok with these monsters giving your child away.  Drobnick has made so many claims regarding the reason that their daughter was taken yet documents clearly state trauncy.  No reason for adoption right?  Think again.  The devious devils in social services scam, lie, change documents, make up false abuse claims....whatever they need to do to keep your child.  Last hearing Drobnick went back 10 years to find something on Tony.  Really??  10 years??  These people are borderline psycotic in their behavior and determination to hoard children.  Time for the BIG GUN attorneys to step up.  Look out CYS we are coming...


Berks County Children and Youth again Abusing Families


Please read the following story where once again Berks County Children and Youth Services seperated a parent and child.  Cesar needs to be reunited with family not in foster care where he is at risk of not receiving the proper treatment.  Time is crucial in getting this child back home.  Once again funds from taxpayer dollars being used to abuse power.  Money could be spent on supplying a nurse and keeping this child with his MOM!  Caseworker Adrian Peeples  Court Appointed Attorney David Maynard and Attorney Mark Freeman who has already won a case against this same Hershey doctor will be handling the case.

Jessica and Ceasars Story
Pennsylvania mother Jessica Battiato is frustrated with a doctor and a system that refuses to look for the medical cause of her baby’s condition, instead placing the blame on the parents. Since her son Cesar, now 5 months old, was taken by child protective services 2 months ago, her son has been diagnosed with rickets and hypotonia by a radiology expert. However, CPS seized custody of Cesar in April, based on accusations by Penn State child abuse specialist, Dr. Kathryn Crowell, that Cesar’s injuries could only be caused by abuse.                                               
 Dr. Crowell has been accused of falsely testifying against parents before. In a 2009 case she accused a parent of child abuse which led to a father spending over a year in jail. A jury later found him not guilty.                     
Jessica wants answers for her baby, and she wants her baby back home, not in a foster home.                                
“My son needs medical attention. He doesn’t need to be neglected by the state. They are delaying him in his care.”  Continue reading :
http://medicalkidnap.com/2015/06/26/medical-kidnapping-in-pennsylvania-parents-of-baby-with-rickets-accused-of-abuse/

Saturday, May 9, 2015

Berks Independent Gazette

I have recently taken a position with the Berks County Independent Gazette and will be writing about the corruption in the Children and Youth Services agencies.  If you want to share your story I want to hear it.  The first issue comes out in June and will have a featured Berks case.  Please pick up your FREE copy at participating businesses.  True reporting for Berks County residents that the Reading Eagle has not covered.

Saturday, April 26, 2014

Protecting a Newborn from Kidnapping at Hospital

This is the notice that is to protect all newborn babies from being kidnapped from a hospital.  Utilize it in your living will when going into hospital or before admission.
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/242  Roxanne Gringe wrote this about the protection.
Very important that you have a federal lawsuit (civil rights weakest) - strongest nature of action: personal injury cause of action Racketeering Influenced Corrupt Organization Legal Malpractice (fraud billing) 18 U.S.C. Fraud of Identification Documents and related information; Dept of justice claim for damages form 95 personal injuries disability or wrongful death caused by employee(s) of federally funded agency and the claim form served on the agency or the federal lawsuit suit complaint served on defendant(s) who committed perjury to cause the State Court to malpractice Municipal, State and Federal Statutes. 

Another preventative administrative step we took was to pay for and order our old Child Abuse Clearances - a Modus Operandi of intentional DHS employees to summarily defraud state Child Abuse Registries so that they can falsely justify their violating Family Preservation Policies of Federal Funding paying for the Children's protective services delegated through the state agencies. The case worker employee makes the false allegation of child abuse to a state database so every relative who would be a choice for preserving family is ruled out and the dishonest state employee receives the financial incentive bonus to pocket into their own pockets at least $6,000 if they can say the child has to be placed with a DHS foster contractor and then of course after no contact and administrative errors no accountability the behavioral health bonding evaluator contractor invariably says too much time as passed and the child is better off adopted out would be traumatized if returned to their real family who was kept busy jumping through hoops of family service plans that amass even more falsified or negligent perjurious reports to the Court who now has no idea of what the evidence is in the best interest of any divorce custody child support or incarceration matter.

You want to create a paper and data disc or flash drive easily transmittal notice with your back up for support. You want to have at least original signed paper sets for handing out at the hospital and keeping one on you at all times to show local law enforcement who DHS employee might invoke to enforce an unlawful act. You want to inform the local law enforcement officer who remember is also a working class person wanting to do their job but also having their own moral set of principals and not necessarily wishing t cause any harm, that the agency employee is restrained from touching or transporting any member of your family or yourself because of the agencies' prior malpractice and injuries causes documented in these federal actions. You want to tell the local law enforcement official that the agency nor it's employees have jurisdiction that jurisdiction rests in federal court and you are a Federal Crime Witness Claimant in the process of recovering damages for the harms this agency has already caused. 

You want to politely inform the local law enforcement who might assist a DHS employee in transporting your newborn or arresting anyone in the family that county or ity which employees them in addition to that particular officer can be sued for their personal assets as well as for the actions in violating USC 18 242 Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law.

The responsible but assertive pre-planned organized preventive steps turned out to be the administrative solution for rescuing now 16 months old Grayson my grandson from assuredly planned DHS retaliation kidnap of our newborn in the hospital and for stopping further illegal detainers, unlawful imprisonments of protective grandmother and mother and the proof of attempted murder of grandmother on March 8, 2010 at City of Philadelphia jail when I tried to save my grandbabies Ezekiel Zadkiel Brown and Arriyel Roxanne Brown from Fern Brown Caplan's taking bribes to Senior Judge Robert J. Matthews needing to cover up his colleagues felonies which resulted in the Philadelphia Family Court being abused to issue Child Abuse orders that caused my grandchildren to be 06/08/10 PKPA mob assault with baseball bats, guns and beatings to be housed with a convicted rapist sheldon holloway and irreparably injured living in squalor conditions while the ignorant thug mob assault fugitives enjoy the coverage given to them by the corruption in Philadelphia Family Court and Mayor's Nutter's legacy of nepotism corruption.

Viewing my posts

If you are having trouble viewing my posts because of line throughs click on the story in the right column and it becomes line free.

Childline Records

If you or your children have been reported or accused of child abuse or a victim you should get your Childline records.
You can call 717-783-1964
or send a certified request for records to: I included an example letter.
Terri Warner
Quality Assurance for the Commonwealth of PA
Department of Public Welfare
Hillcrest Building 2nd Floor
Harrisburg, PA 17110
Date:
Dear Ms. Warner It was brought to my attention that there were calls made (or that there was a report made) regarding myself, my children from city,PA between (give date report was made or a date span when it was made). Since I never received a standard letter regarding any report, nor was I notified that any investigation was being conducted on (name) I don't believe a report was made/or..I want a copy of a report that was made. I would like for you to review your records and verify if there is a report. I would appreciate your response as so as possible. You can also add since this involves a current court matter or children and youth services refuses to release information, or I am being denied employment...whatever your situation. Thank you
Sincerely
Your name
address
phone number