Wednesday, November 21, 2018

Access and Visitation Blocking: The First Ingredient of Parental Alienation

http://www.jmichaelbone.com/blog1/access-and-visitation-blocking-the-first-ingredient-of-parental-alienation
Picture

Protesting Verdict in Child Death Case Williamsport, PA

https://wnep.com/2018/11/20/protesting-verdict-in-child-death-case/

When the Child Protective Services System Gets Child Removal Wrong

https://www.cato-unbound.org/2018/11/09/diane-redleaf/when-child-protective-services-system-gets-child-removal-wrong

Right to be a parent Affadavit to file

DECLARATION OF MY RIGHT TO PARENT I, _____________________________, declare by this affidavit that I have a constitutionally protected right to parent my child and I have a constitutional right of privacy regarding the affairs of my family and the medical treatment for myself and my children. The United States Supreme Court has held that parents have a constitutionally protected liberty interest in the care, custody and management of their children. See Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745, 758-59, 102 S. Ct. 1388, 1397. "As a general rule, therefore, before parents may be deprived of the care, custody or management of their children without their consent, due process—ordinarily a court proceeding resulting in an order permitting removal—must be accorded to them." Tenenbaum v. Williams, 193 F.3d 581, 593 (2d Cir. 1999) (citing Stanley v. Illinois, 405 U.S. 645, 649, 92 S. Ct. 1208, 1212). "At the same time, however, the State has a profound interest in the welfare of the child, particularly his or her being sheltered from abuse." Id. at 593-94. Consequently, courts have recognized that a state may constitutionally remove children threatened with imminent harm when it is justified by emergency circumstances. See, e.g., Mabe v. San Bernardino County, Dep't of Pub. Soc. Servs., 237 F.3d 1101, 1106 (9th Cir. 2001); Brokaw v. Mercer County, 235 F.3d 1000, 1020 (7th Cir. 2000); Tenenbaum, 193 F.3d at 593-94; Hollingsworth v. Hill, 110 F.3d 733, 739 (10th Cir. 1997); Jordan by Jordan v. Jackson, 15 F.3d 333, 346 (4th Cir. 1994); United States v. Edmondson, 791 F.2d 1512, 1514 (11th Cir. 1986) (allowing warrantless search and seizure in criminal cases where exigent circumstances exist). Parents have a fundamental right to the custody of their children, and the deprivation of that right effects a cognizable injury. See Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745, 758-59, 102 S. Ct. 1388, 1397. In the protection of this fundamental right to parent, I should be afforded at a minimum the constitutional protections afforded to a criminal defendant who faces the loss of his fundamental loss of liberty in a criminal pro includes, all state employees, all court appointed Guardian ad Litems, volunteer advocates, and potential witnesses known to the prosecuting agency (or persons). The right to choose the caretaker for my child, including relatives or friends, during the pendency of the prosecution. The right to choose an alternative ‘parent’ for my child, if the state so decides that that my inability to parents poses an immediate and irreparable risk of harm. The right to have competent appointed counsel who will demand due process and who is trained to protect the rights of parents. The right to bring an action post termination if I so feel that my counsel has been so incompetent as my constitutional rights were offended (such as a postconviction relief petition provided for criminal defendants). An absolute right to appeal. The right to rehabilitate any shortcomings that I may have as a parent with the assistance of professionals of my choosing, with a right to access to the funds allowed for these services under Federal Funding grants. The right to have the prosecutors of an action against be compelled to prove each and every element beyond a reasonable doubt. (and not clear and convincing evidence) FURTHER, I declare that these rights are inalienable and endowed by our Creator. As our Declaration of Independence stated in 1776, “That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. It is my declaration that the reliance and use of publicly funded mechanisms intended to destroy my family relationships forever can only come from a despotic government.
I DECLARE THESE RIGHTS.
______________________________
Signed Address:
_____________________
 _____________________
___________________

Thursday, November 15, 2018

From 2014 U.S. Foster Care: A Flawed Solution That Leads To Long-Term Problems?

It has only gotten worse!!!!!

http://www.stirjournal.com/2014/05/12/u-s-foster-care-a-flawed-solution-that-leads-to-more-long-term-problems/

Call the PA Attorney General

‪We, the keepers of law & order, don't take our oath lightly.‬
‪Law enforcement safeguards society & speaks truth to power.‬
‪Anyone who seeks to disturb the rule of law - upsetting the balance of justice for political purposes - will not succeed.‬
‪Stay tuned...‬
PA Office of Attorney General / Press Office
16th Floor, Strawberry Square
Harrisburg, PA 17120
Phone:
717-787-5211
Fax:
717-787-8242
Email:
press@attorneygeneral.gov

Tuesday, November 13, 2018

HOW THE BAR ASSOCIATION THROUGH THEIR UPL COMMITTEE PROTECTS ILLEGAL FAMILY LAW PRACTICES.

https://www.fixfamilycourts.com/how-the-bar-association-through-their-upl-committee-protects-illegal-family-law-practicesRonBPalmer

GAL Complaint/Form

http://www.mebaroverseers.org/gal_review_board/gal_complaint.html



Civil Rights Conspiract Statute

Judge ______ ________, and all actors acting under their direction and Oath of Office in the ___________ Court, in ___________ acted with full judicial cognizance that they were committing multiple felonies while acting in Executive, ministerial duties during case number _________, producing official documents requiring recording with public office , as incomplete written instrument. Any alleged order unsigned by a clerk and not entered is void, a forgery under 28 USC sec 1691 all writs from courts must have a judicial signature , all money judgments must be signed and entered by a clerk. All Orders require signature and entry with clerk, therefore all orders of Case Number _____________ are forgeries.
The persons in this felony criminal complaint have all knowingly
colluded to deprive the me of
protected rights and property issuing a false certificate, a
person is guilty of issuing a false
certificate when being a public servant
authorized by law to make or issue
official certificates or other official
written instruments which are court
orders also complaints with the intent
to defraud deceive or injure another
person he issues such an instrument or
makes the same with the intent that it
be used knowing that it contains a false
statement or false information official
misconduct he commits an act relating to
his official office but constituting an
unauthorized exercise of his official
functions knowing that such act is
unauthorized or he knowingly refrains
from performing a duty which is he is
required by law to perform .
I, Donald Lee Faulkner, swear under the penalties for perjury, that everything alleged in this complaint to be the absolute truth. Signed _______ on _____________, 2018_____________________
Authorized signing agent printed name____________________
Under Section 241 of Title 18 is the civil rights conspiracy statute. Section 241 makes it unlawful for two or more persons to agree together to injure, threaten, or intimidate a person in any state, territory or district in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him/her by the Constitution or the laws of the United States, (or because of his/her having exercised the same). Unlike most conspiracy statutes, Section 241 does not require that one of the conspirators commit an overt act prior to the conspiracy becoming a crime.
The offense is punishable by a range of imprisonment up to a life term or the death penalty, depending upon the circumstances of the crime, and the resulting injury, if any.
TITLE 18, U.S.C., SECTION 241
If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same;...
They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, they shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

U.S. Parents Separated from Children by Abusive Government Agencies

https://pjmedia.com/parenting/american-horror-story-american-parents-separated-from-children-by-abusive-government-agencies/
Woman with tape over mouth