Wednesday, December 27, 2017
A Terroristic Divorce
http://work2bdone.com/live/
RULE 1.6: Sedition by the American Bar Association IN EVERY STATE.
SEDITION:
In law, sedition is overt conduct, such as speech and organization, that is deemed by the legal authority to tend toward insurrection against the established order. Sedition often includes subversion of a constitution and incitement of discontent (or resistance) to lawful authority.
In law, sedition is overt conduct, such as speech and organization, that is deemed by the legal authority to tend toward insurrection against the established order. Sedition often includes subversion of a constitution and incitement of discontent (or resistance) to lawful authority.
The American Bar Association authored the law for the state Supreme Courts to enact, promulgate or mandate without the review by any state Legislature or Governor.
There was no review of the constitutionality of the law, directly, indirectly or collaterally.
Once enacted it became unlawful for the state to remove or repeal.
Once targeted with injustice by a lawyer or a judge, the victim was left with no where to turn. The injustice became inescapable.
The only ones who profited were the lawyers and judges – the membership of the American Bar Association.
The victim was left with no resolution, … but could continue to try to escape by paying lawyers who were mandated by the same law to not reveal the cause of the injustice or face disciplinary action.
Lawyers making work for lawyers. The ABA, a trade organization, was looking after the interest of their members. Business was the motivation for the crime which undermined the justice system and sacrificed the integrity of the judiciary.
The ABA addressed the judicial corruption of Operation Graylord by making it illegal to prosecute judicial corruption. Indirectly sacrificing the integrity of every judge. Collaterally denying the constitutional rights of the people. Making it illegal for lawyers to expose their seditious actions of the American Bar Association in EVERY state.
The United States Constitution is the supreme law of the land…
The People find the seditious actions of the American Bar Association in every state repugnant to their constitution.
The people find the conspiracy by every lawyer acting directly indirectly or collaterally to deny people of their constitutional rights to be criminal.
ON BEHALF OF THE VICTIMS, AND OURSELVES, WE RESPECTFULLY PETITION THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT AND THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL – the only lawyer in the country who may lawfully act as he cannot be bound by Rule 1.6 and compelled to ignore the crime – TO PROSECUTE.
The Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 is in the Third Circuit Court of Appeals.
Plaintiffs have lawfully petitioned the court and served the challenge on every US Attorney General to address a constitutional calamity which has ‘LAWFULLY BUT UNCONSTITUTIONALLY’ persisted in the United State for decades.
Rule 1.6 made it illegal for a lawyer to fix this crisis. It took two pro se defendants to find the needle in haystack of injustice… all deliberately and intentionally caused by the author of the ‘law’ … The American Bar Association.
The same unconstitutional law, same number, same name, in every state.
Read more at www.work2bdone.com/live
JUSTICE IS COMING.
The Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6
Eastern District of Pennsylvania # 13-4614 (2-13-cv-04614-TON)
Third Circuit Court of Appeals # 13-4591
Eastern District of Pennsylvania # 13-4614 (2-13-cv-04614-TON)
Third Circuit Court of Appeals # 13-4591
Rule 1.6 refers to the Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 1.6 – CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION unlawfully enacted into ‘law’ by each state Supreme Court. Unlawfully enacted because it results in the denial of rights and privileges protected by the United States Constitution.
Wednesday, December 13, 2017
Tuesday, December 5, 2017
Friday, November 24, 2017
Foster kid placed in West Philly 'house of horrors' wins $11M in lawsuit
Saturday, November 18, 2017
Judge ordered to reconsider baby’s placement
Sullivan supported request to put child in foster care rather than with his father
http://www.altoonamirror.com/news/local-news/2017/10/judge-ordered-to-reconsider-babys-placement/
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
