Wednesday, August 16, 2017
Petition for Judicial Disclosure
Following recent revelations that judges are laundering bribes and pay offs, often through their home loans and also through other mechanisms, Randy Kelton of Rule of Law Radio proposed constructing a boiler plate pleading which individuals could file in their separate court cases, requesting judicial disclosure.
The fact is we are now on to them. We are on to not only the type of playbook dictating the decisions which are hurting our families and our loved ones. We are now on to the methods by which they are self enriching at the cost of justice.
Courtesy of Kelton, the pleading is attached. Filed in multiple jurisdictions, this pleading has the potential of creating a shock wave. You are free to use it as you see fit.
I'll be back on Kelton's show soon to discuss this further. Keep the faith....
Superior Court of California - County of San Diego
|
Petitioner,
vs.
_______________________
Respondent
|
Case # __________________________
Petition for Judicial
Disclosure
Assigned:Ronald Frazier
|
Now comes Petitioner and moves the court as follows:
Petition for Judicial Disclosure
Petitioner requests disclosure of the following:
1.
Any and all personal knowledge the court has of
disputed evidentiary facts concerning the instant proceeding. This request shall be deemed to include the
judge, or the spouse of the judge, or a person within the third degree of
relationship to either of them, or the spouse of such a person is to the
judge’s knowledge likely to be a material witness in the proceeding.
2.
Any and all service as a lawyer the court has
performed in this proceeding, or in any other proceeding involving the same
issues where he or she served as a lawyer for a party in the present proceeding
or gave advice to a party in the present proceeding upon a matter involved in
the action or proceeding where the judge was a party to the proceeding, or an
officer, director, or trustee of a party, was a client of the judge when the
judge was in the private practice of law or a client of a lawyer with whom the judge
was associated in the private practice of law, or served as a lawyer in the
proceeding or was associated in the private practice of law with the
judge.
3. Any
and all service as a lawyer the judge has performed for, or acted as an officer
of, a public agency that is a party to the proceeding shall be deemed to have
served as a lawyer in the proceeding if he or she personally advised or in any
way represented the public agency concerning the factual or legal issues in the
proceeding. This request shall be
deemed to include any and all financial interest in the subject matter in a
proceeding or in a party to the proceeding.
This request shall be deemed to include the judge’s spouse or minor
child living in the household who has a financial interest, judge or the spouse
of the judge if either has served as a fiduciary who has a financial
interest. This request shall also
include the judge, or the spouse of the
judge, or a person within the third degree of relationship to either of them,
or the spouse of such a person who is or was a party to the proceeding or an
officer, director, or trustee of a party or a lawyer or a spouse of a lawyer in
the proceeding who is the spouse, former spouse, child, sibling, or parent of
the judge or the judge’s spouse or if such a person is associated in the
private practice of law with a lawyer in the proceeding.
4. This
request shall include disclosure of any bias or prejudice toward a lawyer in
the proceeding or any person acting in a pro se capacity in the proceedings.
5.
Any current arrangement concerning prospective
employment or other compensated service as a dispute resolution neutral or is
participating in, or, within the last two years has participated in,
discussions regarding prospective employment or service as a dispute resolution
neutral, or has been engaged in that employment or service, and any of the
following applies:
(i)
The arrangement is, or the prior employment or
discussion was, with a party to the proceeding.
(ii)
The matter before the judge includes issues
relating to the enforcement of either an agreement to submit a dispute to an
alternative dispute resolution process or an award or other final decision by a
dispute resolution neutral.
(iii)
The judge directs the parties to participate in
an alternative dispute resolution process in which the dispute resolution
neutral will be an individual or entity with whom the judge has the
arrangement, has previously been employed or served, or is discussing or has
discussed the employment or service.
(iv)
The judge will select a dispute resolution
neutral or entity to conduct an alternative dispute resolution process in the
matter before the judge, and among those available for selection is an
individual or entity with whom the judge has the arrangement, with whom the
judge has previously been employed or served, or with whom the judge is
discussing or has discussed the employment or service.
6.
Any and all contributions received by the judge
from a party or lawyer in the proceeding, and either of the following
applies.
7.
Any and all contributions from a party or lawyer
in a matter that is before the court.
8.
All money transfers out of the United States.
9.
Any investment or ownership interest in any
business of any kind.
10. Any
purchase or sale of commodities, to include any trade in alternative currencies
by the judge.
11. Any
and all money transactions involving aggregate amounts over a 7 day period that
equal or exceed $10,000.
12. All
real property owned in whole or in part by the judge or any one
connected to the judge with three degrees of consanguinity.
13. All
mortgages taken out in the name of the judge or any legal fiction in which the
judge holds an interest to include anyone connected to the judge with three
degrees of consanguinity.
14. Any
awards in any law suits in favor of the judge or anyone connected to the judge
with three degrees of consanguinity.
15. Any
awards in any law suits in favor of any company the judge owns or has an
interest in.
16. Dates
and times of any visits to any gambling casinos by the judge or anyone
connected to the judge with three degrees of consanguinity.
Respectfully,
________________________
Lawrence Espinoza's Video Showing Criminals Around Our Children
https://www.facebook.com/lawrence.espinoza1/videos/1653063051392779/
Most will know some of these faces. Thanks Lawrence.
Most will know some of these faces. Thanks Lawrence.
PA Grounds for Involuntary Termination of Parental Rights
Pennsylvania
Current Through December 2016
Circumstances That Are Grounds for Termination of Parental Rights
Citation: Cons. Stat. Tit. 23, § 2511(a)
The rights of a parent in regard to a child may be terminated after a petition filed on any of the following grounds:
• The parent, for at least 6 months, either has evidenced a settled purpose of relinquishing parental claim to a child or has
refused or failed to perform parental duties.
• The repeated and continued incapacity, abuse, neglect, or refusal of the parent has caused the child to be without essential
parental care, control, or subsistence necessary for his or her physical or mental well-being, and the conditions and causes of
the incapacity, abuse, neglect, or refusal cannot or will not be remedied by the parent.
• The parent is the presumptive but not the natural father of the child.
• The child has been found under such circumstances that the identity or whereabouts of the parent is unknown and cannot be
ascertained by diligent search, and the parent does not claim the child within 3 months after the child is found.
This material may be freely reproduced and distributed. However, when doing so, please credit Child Welfare Information Gateway.
This publication is available online at https://www.childwelfare.gov/topics/systemwide/laws-policies/statutes/groundtermin/.
Grounds for Involuntary Termination of Parental Rights https://www.childwelfare.gov
52
• The child has been in an out-of-home placement for at least 6 months, the conditions that led to the placement continue to
exist, the parent cannot or will not remedy those conditions within a reasonable period of time, the services or assistance
reasonably available to the parent are not likely to remedy the conditions that led to the removal or placement of the child
within a reasonable period of time, and termination of the parental rights would best serve the needs and welfare of the child.
• In the case of a newborn child, the parent knows or has reason to know of the child's birth, does not reside with the child,
has not married the child's other parent, and has failed for 4 months to make reasonable efforts to maintain substantial and
continuing contact or to support the child.
• The parent is the father of a child conceived as a result of a rape or incest.
• The child has been removed from the care of the parent, 12 months or more have elapsed from the date of removal, the
conditions that led to the removal continue to exist, and termination of parental rights would best serve the needs and welfare
of the child.
• The parent has been convicted of one of the following in which the victim was a child of the parent:
» Criminal homicide
» Aggravated assault
» An attempt, solicitation, or conspiracy to commit an offense listed above
• The parent has committed sexual abuse against the child or another child of the parent, when the judicial adjudication is
based on a finding of 'sexual abuse or exploitation' as defined in § 6303(a).
• The parent is required to register as a sexual offender.
Circumstances That Are Exceptions to Termination of Parental Rights
Citation: Cons. Stat. Tit. 23, § 2511(b)
The rights of a parent shall not be terminated solely on the basis of environmental factors such as inadequate housing, furnishings,
income, clothing, and medical care, if found to be beyond the control of the parent.
Circumstances Allowing Reinstatement of Parental Rights
This issue is not addressed in the statutes reviewed.
REINSTATEMENT OF PARENTAL RIGHTS STATE STATUTE SUMMARY
http://www.ncsl.org/research/human-services/reinstatement-of-parental-rights-state-statute-sum.aspx
PA does not have this but some states do.
PA does not have this but some states do.
Friday, August 11, 2017
Public Integrity Section File Complaint Against Elected Officials for Corruption
https://www.justice.gov/criminal/pin
LEADERSHIP
Raymond Hulser
Chief, Public Integrity Section
Chief, Public Integrity Section
CONTACT
Public Integrity Section Direct Line
(202) 514-1412
(202) 514-1412
Department of Justice Main
switchboard
(202) 514-2000
switchboard
(202) 514-2000
Thursday, August 10, 2017
Phone Numbers you may need
|
Wednesday, August 9, 2017
Rise Magazine Good Read
|
Monday, August 7, 2017
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
