Wednesday, August 23, 2017

Hershey Med Let's 6 year old Die

http://www.pennlive.com/news/2017/08/hershey_med_didnt_monitor_heat.html

Hershey Hospital Cited in Death of Six-Year Old

By Walter F. Roche Jr.

A Hershey hospital has been cited by Pennsylvania health officials for failing to report the unexpected death of a six-year-old boy and failure to follow expected standards of care in treating him.
According to a lengthy state inspection report, the Milton S. Hershey Medical Center only notified the Pennsylvania Health Department of the death after an anonymous informant had reported the Jan. 11 death months after it occurred. Under state law and regulations the death should have been reported within 24 hours of its occurrence.
In response to questions about the citation, the medical center issued a statement acknowledging the delay in reporting the incident and also the fact that there was a 10 hour gap in the recording of the patient's temperature.
"The facility failed to meet the emergency needs of a patient with acceptable standards of practice," the inspection report states.
The boy, who was brought to the hospital's emergency room on Jan. 10, was placed in a warming device due to a low temperature. He had a temperature of 107.6 degrees when he was found unresponsive the next day.
"There were no vitals,"the inspection report states, adding that hospital staffers acknowledged the warming device, called a Bair Hugger," had been on high all night.
He was pronounced dead at 5:39 p.m. on Jan. 11.
In addition to the failure to report the death, the hospital was cited for failing to adequately train employees and failing to follow the warming device manufacturer's guidelines calling for temperature checks every 10 to 20 minutes.
In its statement, the medical center said management did not become aware of the incident until notified by the state following the anonymous complaint to the state Patient Safety Authority.
"This situation raised serious issues, and our response has been equally serious" the hospital said in its statement.
Acknowledging that the state found a total of five violations, the medical center
termed the incident an "unacceptable failure" and said corrective action was initiated  as soon as it received notice of the anonymous complaint.
 The state sent inspectors to the hospital on April 12 and they completed their review the next day. Because the inspectors declared a state of "immediate jeopardy," the hospital was required to respond immediately with a corrective action plan. The "immediate jeopardy" was lifted on April 13.
In its statement the hospital said the boy was suffering from "ongoing, complex and life limiting health issues" and "presumed sepsis" when he was brought to the emergency room in January.
After he was found unresponsive the next day, he was taken to the the hospital's pediatric intensive care unit but died later in the day.
The hospital said its own investigation found "an agency nurse was overseeing the child's care during the 10-hour gap in temperature documentation, and no one involved in the child's care reported the incident to our Patient Safety Department."
In its inspection report, the state said that the nurse in question said she knew she took the patient's temperature but forgot to document it.
"I did not have the computer with me. I was probably busy with something else," she told the inspectors.
The state found that although the nurse had been hired a year earlier, there were no evaluations in her file and core competency for use of the warming device "was not completed."
According to the hospital statement, the facility now limits the use of the warming devices to operating rooms "where patients are continuously attended."
Other steps include training for staffers, including those hired through an agency, on the use of such devices and audits to ensure serious incidents are properly reported.
"As an organization that holds itself accountable for providing the highest quality care while protecting the safety of patients, employees and visitors, we recognize this situation was an unacceptable failure," the hospital said in its statement.
Contact: wfrochejr999@gmail.com

Wednesday, August 16, 2017

Watch Video to Understand How the System Works


https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=1632790490082869&id=100000558025616


15 Warning Signs CPS Workers Look For


http://www.babygaga.com/15-warning-signs-cps-workers-look-for/


Some Good Info

https://sites.google.com/site/stopflcircuit20dcf/home/up-to-date/definitions-of-acronyms/united-states-case-law/dcf-dirty-tricks


Petition for Judicial Disclosure


Following recent revelations that judges are laundering bribes and pay offs, often through their home loans and also through other mechanisms, Randy Kelton of Rule of Law Radio proposed constructing a boiler plate pleading which individuals could file in their separate court cases, requesting judicial disclosure.
The fact is we are now on to them. We are on to not only the type of playbook dictating the decisions which are hurting our families and our loved ones. We are now on to the methods by which they are self enriching at the cost of justice.
Courtesy of Kelton, the pleading is attached. Filed in multiple jurisdictions, this pleading has the potential of creating a shock wave. You are free to use it as you see fit.
I'll be back on Kelton's show soon to discuss this further. Keep the faith.... 


Superior Court of California - County of San Diego

______________________
Petitioner,

vs.

_______________________
Respondent
Case # __________________________
Petition for Judicial Disclosure
Assigned:Ronald Frazier


Now comes Petitioner and moves the court as follows:
Petition for Judicial Disclosure
Petitioner requests disclosure of the following:
1.     Any and all personal knowledge the court has of disputed evidentiary facts concerning the instant proceeding.  This request shall be deemed to include the judge, or the spouse of the judge, or a person within the third degree of relationship to either of them, or the spouse of such a person is to the judge’s knowledge likely to be a material witness in the proceeding.
2.     Any and all service as a lawyer the court has performed in this proceeding, or in any other proceeding involving the same issues where he or she served as a lawyer for a party in the present proceeding or gave advice to a party in the present proceeding upon a matter involved in the action or proceeding where the judge was a party to the proceeding, or an officer, director, or trustee of a party, was a client of the judge when the judge was in the private practice of law or a client of a lawyer with whom the judge was associated in the private practice of law, or served as a lawyer in the proceeding or was associated in the private practice of law with the judge. 

3.     Any and all service as a lawyer the judge has performed for, or acted as an officer of, a public agency that is a party to the proceeding shall be deemed to have served as a lawyer in the proceeding if he or she personally advised or in any way represented the public agency concerning the factual or legal issues in the proceeding.   This request shall be deemed to include any and all financial interest in the subject matter in a proceeding or in a party to the proceeding.  This request shall be deemed to include the judge’s spouse or minor child living in the household who has a financial interest, judge or the spouse of the judge if either has served as a fiduciary who has a financial interest.  This request shall also include the  judge, or the spouse of the judge, or a person within the third degree of relationship to either of them, or the spouse of such a person who is or was a party to the proceeding or an officer, director, or trustee of a party or a lawyer or a spouse of a lawyer in the proceeding who is the spouse, former spouse, child, sibling, or parent of the judge or the judge’s spouse or if such a person is associated in the private practice of law with a lawyer in the proceeding.

4.     This request shall include disclosure of any bias or prejudice toward a lawyer in the proceeding or any person acting in a pro se capacity in the proceedings.

5.     Any current arrangement concerning prospective employment or other compensated service as a dispute resolution neutral or is participating in, or, within the last two years has participated in, discussions regarding prospective employment or service as a dispute resolution neutral, or has been engaged in that employment or service, and any of the following applies:
(i)             The arrangement is, or the prior employment or discussion was, with a party to the proceeding.
(ii)           The matter before the judge includes issues relating to the enforcement of either an agreement to submit a dispute to an alternative dispute resolution process or an award or other final decision by a dispute resolution neutral.
(iii)         The judge directs the parties to participate in an alternative dispute resolution process in which the dispute resolution neutral will be an individual or entity with whom the judge has the arrangement, has previously been employed or served, or is discussing or has discussed the employment or service.
(iv)          The judge will select a dispute resolution neutral or entity to conduct an alternative dispute resolution process in the matter before the judge, and among those available for selection is an individual or entity with whom the judge has the arrangement, with whom the judge has previously been employed or served, or with whom the judge is discussing or has discussed the employment or service.
6.     Any and all contributions received by the judge from a party or lawyer in the proceeding, and either of the following applies. 
7.     Any and all contributions from a party or lawyer in a matter that is before the court. 
8.     All money transfers out of the United States.
9.     Any investment or ownership interest in any business of any kind.
10.  Any purchase or sale of commodities, to include any trade in alternative currencies by the judge. 
11.  Any and all money transactions involving aggregate amounts over a 7 day period that equal or exceed $10,000.
12.  All real property owned in whole or in part by the judge or any one connected to the judge with three degrees of consanguinity.
13.  All mortgages taken out in the name of the judge or any legal fiction in which the judge holds an interest to include anyone connected to the judge with three degrees of consanguinity.   
14.  Any awards in any law suits in favor of the judge or anyone connected to the judge with three degrees of consanguinity.   
15.  Any awards in any law suits in favor of any company the judge owns or has an interest in. 
16.  Dates and times of any visits to any gambling casinos by the judge or anyone connected to the judge with three degrees of consanguinity. 
Respectfully,

________________________ 

Lawrence Espinoza's Video Showing Criminals Around Our Children

https://www.facebook.com/lawrence.espinoza1/videos/1653063051392779/

Most will know some of these faces.  Thanks Lawrence.




PA Grounds for Involuntary Termination of Parental Rights

Pennsylvania Current Through December 2016 Circumstances That Are Grounds for Termination of Parental Rights Citation: Cons. Stat. Tit. 23, § 2511(a) The rights of a parent in regard to a child may be terminated after a petition filed on any of the following grounds: • The parent, for at least 6 months, either has evidenced a settled purpose of relinquishing parental claim to a child or has refused or failed to perform parental duties. • The repeated and continued incapacity, abuse, neglect, or refusal of the parent has caused the child to be without essential parental care, control, or subsistence necessary for his or her physical or mental well-being, and the conditions and causes of the incapacity, abuse, neglect, or refusal cannot or will not be remedied by the parent. • The parent is the presumptive but not the natural father of the child. • The child has been found under such circumstances that the identity or whereabouts of the parent is unknown and cannot be ascertained by diligent search, and the parent does not claim the child within 3 months after the child is found. This material may be freely reproduced and distributed. However, when doing so, please credit Child Welfare Information Gateway. This publication is available online at https://www.childwelfare.gov/topics/systemwide/laws-policies/statutes/groundtermin/. Grounds for Involuntary Termination of Parental Rights https://www.childwelfare.gov 52 • The child has been in an out-of-home placement for at least 6 months, the conditions that led to the placement continue to exist, the parent cannot or will not remedy those conditions within a reasonable period of time, the services or assistance reasonably available to the parent are not likely to remedy the conditions that led to the removal or placement of the child within a reasonable period of time, and termination of the parental rights would best serve the needs and welfare of the child. • In the case of a newborn child, the parent knows or has reason to know of the child's birth, does not reside with the child, has not married the child's other parent, and has failed for 4 months to make reasonable efforts to maintain substantial and continuing contact or to support the child. • The parent is the father of a child conceived as a result of a rape or incest. • The child has been removed from the care of the parent, 12 months or more have elapsed from the date of removal, the conditions that led to the removal continue to exist, and termination of parental rights would best serve the needs and welfare of the child. • The parent has been convicted of one of the following in which the victim was a child of the parent: » Criminal homicide » Aggravated assault » An attempt, solicitation, or conspiracy to commit an offense listed above • The parent has committed sexual abuse against the child or another child of the parent, when the judicial adjudication is based on a finding of 'sexual abuse or exploitation' as defined in § 6303(a). • The parent is required to register as a sexual offender. Circumstances That Are Exceptions to Termination of Parental Rights Citation: Cons. Stat. Tit. 23, § 2511(b) The rights of a parent shall not be terminated solely on the basis of environmental factors such as inadequate housing, furnishings, income, clothing, and medical care, if found to be beyond the control of the parent. Circumstances Allowing Reinstatement of Parental Rights This issue is not addressed in the statutes reviewed.

REINSTATEMENT OF PARENTAL RIGHTS STATE STATUTE SUMMARY

http://www.ncsl.org/research/human-services/reinstatement-of-parental-rights-state-statute-sum.aspx

PA does not have this but some states do.


Friday, August 11, 2017