U.S. Supreme Court rulings to use against CYS in Pennsylvania Courts, who consistently dismiss self-represented litigant cases using the bogus rules they designed for just that purpose.
"The assertion of federal rights, when plainly and reasonably made, are not to be defeated under the name of local practice." Davis v. Wechler, 263 U.S. 22, 24; Stromberb v. California, 283 U.S. 359; NAACP v. Alabama, 375 U.S. 449.
Miranda v. Arizona holds that "Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rulemaking or legislation which would abrogate them" 384 U.S. 436 (1966).
No comments:
Post a Comment