PA. COURT RULING
Drug, alcohol tests can’t be required
From wire reports
Pennsylvania’s Children and Youth Services agencies have no legal
authority to require suspects to submit to drug and/or alcohol testing
during investigations of child abuse reports, the state Supreme Court
ruled Tuesday, siding with a prosecutor who had come under the scrutiny
of a county child welfare agency.
The unanimous decision said the Child Protective Services Law does not
“expressly or implicitly authorize collecting samples of bodily
fluids, without consent, for testing.”
It was a win for Greene County District Attorney David J. Russo, who
disputed the authority of the child welfare agency from neighboring
Fayette County to require the tests. The agency was brought in to
investigate complaints about Russo. He says no abuse has ever occurred
to his children.
The
county began investigating Russo based on a confidential tip that he had
been intoxicated in public with one of five children, as well as an
inaccurate claim he had been charged with spousal abuse. Russo was a lawyer in private practice when the investigation began. A Republican, he was elected district attorney in November.
Russo has said forcing drug tests on Greene County residents who were
the subjects of child-abuse complaints had become a routine practice
before he challenged its legality. He said Tuesday that practice has
apparently ended.
Fayette County lost a lower-court decision in its quest to require Russo
to submit to an observable urine test. Superior Court also rejected
Fayette
TESTS » PAGE 2
Tests
FROM PAGE 1
County’s attempt to force Russo and his wife to permit investigators to inspect conditions in their home.
Fayette investigators interviewed all five of the Russo children while they were at school and were unable to confirm allegations against him,
the Superior Court said in a previous ruling.
Russo warned in a court filing that drug testing of parents without
probable cause “will inevitably lead to the forcible extraction of
bodily fluids, the incarceration of parents for refusing to comply, or
the exile of parents from their children.”
No comments:
Post a Comment